The crisis of ethnographic authority
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6008/CBPC2674-6654.2023.001.0003Keywords:
Ethnography, Ethnographic crisis, Methodology in social researchAbstract
The purpose of this article is to understand, in a summary way, the formation and crisis of ethnographic authority. More than a methodological issue, I understand “ethnographic authority”, following the paths of Clifford Geertz (2009) and James Clifford (2002), as the engine of ethnographic doing itself and, in general, with the conditions for the constitution of Anthropology as discipline.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Humanum Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
TThe CBPC - Companhia Brasileira de Produção Científica (Brazil CNPJ: 11.221.422/0001-03) the material rights of the published works. The rights relate to the publication of the work anywhere in the world, including rights to renewals, expansions and dissemination of the contribution, as well as other subsidiary rights. All electronically published works may subsequently be published in printed collections under the coordination of this company and / or its partners. The authors preserve the copyright, but are not allowed to publish the contribution in another medium, printed or digital, in Portuguese or in translation. Exceptionally, the authors of the special section “Registration of Artistic Works (photographs, music, poetry, poems, sonnets, etc.)” in “Arts / Music” journals preserve copyright and materials.